Talk:Sweet Justice/@comment-95.55.246.180-20200228092700/@comment-162.234.160.158-20200229205311

How about we vote on it?

I for one am in favor of keeping all information--even speculation--available, with the usual disclaimer that it's at best an educated guess. Let's not forget, the guys doing this guy have accurately predicted a few changes (such as the return of Magical Apparatus) based on the limited info released by the devs, that that information was VERY helpful.

In any situation where the devs want to obfuscate information, a prediction is never a certainty. Not only is this IMPLICITLY understood by anybody who frequents this wiki, it's also EXPLICITLY been acknowledged, repeatedly, on multiple event pages, both in the comments and sometimes in the wiki articles themselves.

Certain folks--like OP of this thread--would rather keep everybody in the dark because he, personally, is unwilling to apply the minimal amount of effort to understand where this information is coming. Again, and I can't stress this enough--the guys posting these event pages have EXPLICITLY STATED that the information is a best guess, and often state the reason for that guess. For example, IIRC correctly they were able to predict the return of Daily Contest cards 5 and 6 in a previous event by looking at the game data and seeing that the cards had single-dupe seductions--something that didn't apply this time because the devs set up these cards to require the usual legendary duplicate amounts.

If you can't be bothered to read carefully enough to see what's spelled out explicitly, then maybe you're opinion on how this wiki doesn't deserve any serious consideration.