Talk:Assassin/@comment-24.233.112.41-20190311060423/@comment-24.233.112.41-20190316222818

ALL I'm saying is if a card is NOT AVAILABLE to SOMEONE, THEY should not have to face it in battle, that's all. I'm fine to play against ANY card that (at some point) I CAN obtain...(even if I never have the means). NOT saying I shouldn't have to play cards I don't HAVE, do you understand the difference??

I'm glad to hear from people like you that think unbalanced scales are perfectly fine. 'Cause I knew (eventually) one of you would pop up and chime in, in EXACTLY the way you did... To your question: I would assume NO, because NOBODY faces the boss in those games... It's the same rules for ANYONE who plays... That DOES NOT seem to be the case here... Do you understand that...? Why doesn't a lack of standards bother poeple like you?? Remember that next time the law is randomly/arbitrarily enforced on you but not the next guy...

Yeah, it's only a game... Why is balance and unilaterall rules such a bad thing?? Why is it that those of us who give a damn about unilateral right and wrong are deamed whiners by those of you who don't???

We are all entitled to our opinions, some of us base them in logic...

But hey, LIFE isn't fair, so lets not give a damn if anything else is either...